4 x Adsorbing Polymer Membrane. No animal or human tissue makes consent and patient acceptance easier.

Buy 3 get 1 free. 

COMPARISONS

With PTFE

• No 2nd procedure to remove the adsorbing polymer membrane.

Powerbone polymer membranes make a great alternative for clinicians familiar with PTFE. Both require fixation due to their stiffer nature. Unlike PTFE Powerbone Polymer membrane adsorbs completely and does not require a second procedure for removal. 

With COLLAGEN

Clinicians familiar with resorbing collagen membranes should familiarise themselves with the key material differences before using resorbing polymer membranes.  Presented with a relative stiffness which helps create space. Fixation with pins or membrane tacks is recommended.

When these differences are overcome clinicians can enjoy significant performance gains. Compared to collagen, adsorbing polymer membranes:

• Do not stick to instruments.

• Do not collapse giving excellent space maintenance.

• Do not degrade in the presence of salivary enzymes providing excellent exposure resilience.

• Offer prolonged resorption with a barrier function of 12–16 weeks.

COMPARISON GUIDE: Refresh on the key variances before integrating resorbable polymer into your treatment kit. Download our transition guide.

Adsorbing Barrier Membranes Compared_Regen Store_OCT24

SPEC SHEET

Powerbone Synthetic Membrane_Oct20

LINKED PRODUCTS

Powerbone Membrane Tack System

Dental Studio Bone and Membrane Fixation System