Flexible Graft (Resorbing Synthetic Lattice) by Powerbone

£125.00£150.00

All prices are Excl VAT.

Clear

REGEN STORE DISCOUNT - Buy 5 get a 6th Free!

SKU: powerbone-flex Categories: , ,
Description

Flexible ‘form stable’ Graft, Clot Support and Barrier in one. 

-4mm thickness – graft and barrier in one for ridge augmentations.

-2mm thickness – ‘jumping gap’ graft between the implant and buccal bone wall.   

 

UNIQUE FORMULATION

  • Closely formed lattice sheet of PLA + PCL polymer – clot hosting, space maintenance scaffold.  

  • Embedded with silicate substituted βeta-Tricalcium Phosphate granules – Biomechanically, radiographically, and histologically equivalence to autograft (7).

  • Compressed non-porous barrier layer.

FLEXIBLE APPLICATION

  • Can be folded and tacked.

  • Can be wetted before application – saline, blood or centrifuged blood products.

  • Thickness options of 2mm or 4mm for extended indications.

PREMIUM PERFORMANCE

  • Embedded bone graft induces angiogenesis and fast apatite formation (1,2,5)

  • Full resorption after c6 months.

  • A synthetic alternative to autogenous bone block or lamella graft.

MORE INFO

Powerbone Flexible Graft_Oct20

LINKED PRODUCTS

Bionnovation Bone Screw

Inion Resorbable Polymer Tack Kit.  

Powerbone Flexible Graft – CREATED BY EXPERTS FOR EXPERTS

REFERENCES
1.Iimori Y, Kameshima Y, Yasumori A, Okada K. Effect of solid/solution ratio on apatite formation from CaSiO3 ceramics in simulated body fluid. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2004;15:1247–1253.
2.Xu S, Lin K, Wang Z, Chang J, Wang L, Lu J, Ning C. Reconstruction of calvarial defect of rabbits using porous calcium silicate bioactive ceramics. Biomaterials 2008;29:2588–2596.
3.Hing KA, Wilson LF, Buckland T. Comparative performance of three ceramic bone graft substitutes. Spine J. 2007; 7(4):475-490
5.Dashnyam, K.; El-Fiqi, A.; Buitrago, J.O.; Perez, R.A.; Knowles, J.C.; Kim, H.-W. A mini-review focused on the proangiogenic role of silicate ions released from silicon-containing biomaterials. J. Tissue Eng. 2017, 8, 1–13.
6.Test Report Bonegraft Biologic, No: 2018-BME-05-1, 2018-BME-05-2, 2018-BME-05-3 and 2018-BME-05-4. 
7.Licina et al, Comparison of (SiCAP) with (Infuse) in Posterolateral Instrumented Lumbar Fusion Global Spine J 2015;5:471–478.