Regen Store
Search

Powerbone Flexible Graft (Synthetic Bone Graft)

£94.00£134.00

All prices are Excl VAT.

REGEN STORE DISCOUNT - Buy 5 get a 6th Free!

Fully resorbing, space-creating, flexible synthetic bone graft, tissue support matrix and barrier combined.

UNIQUE FORMULATION

  • Resorbable polymer lattice embedded with micro-porous Powerbone graft granules.

  • Compressed non-porous upper barrier layer.

  • 2mm or 4mm thickness and multiple sizes to suit all defects.

  • Easy to place.

  • Apply direct or pre-soak with saline, blood, centrifuged cells or medicines.

  • Inbuilt stability.


THREE-STAGE RESORPTION

  1. Silicate resorption occurs first, inducing angiogenesis and fast apatite formation (1,2,5)

  2. Beta TCP provides an osteoconductive scaffold to support new bone formation over a 3 to 4-month period.

  3. PLA Polymer lattice fibres adsorb in 5 to 8 months. 


CASE HISTORY – Powerbone Flexible Graft as peri-implant onlay. 

Powerbone Flexible Graft_Peri implant onlay_Feb 24


DEMONSTRATION ON  MODEL – Powerbone Flexible Graft as peri-implant onlay. 



DOWNLOAD SPEC SHEET Powerbone Flexible Graft_Regen Store_Oct20

LINKED PRODUCTS      Fixation     Sutures 


Powerbone Flexible Graft – CREATED BY EXPERTS FOR EXPERTS


REFERENCES
1.Iimori Y, Kameshima Y, Yasumori A, Okada K. Effect of solid/solution ratio on apatite formation from CaSiO3 ceramics in simulated body fluid. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2004;15:1247–1253.
2.Xu S, Lin K, Wang Z, Chang J, Wang L, Lu J, Ning C. Reconstruction of calvarial defect of rabbits using porous calcium silicate bioactive ceramics. Biomaterials 2008;29:2588–2596.
3.Hing KA, Wilson LF, Buckland T. Comparative performance of three ceramic bone graft substitutes. Spine J. 2007; 7(4):475-490
5.Dashnyam, K.; El-Fiqi, A.; Buitrago, J.O.; Perez, R.A.; Knowles, J.C.; Kim, H.-W. A mini-review focused on the proangiogenic role of silicate ions released from silicon-containing biomaterials. J. Tissue Eng. 2017, 8, 1–13.
6.Test Report Bonegraft Biologic, No: 2018-BME-05-1, 2018-BME-05-2, 2018-BME-05-3 and 2018-BME-05-4. 
7.Licina et al, Comparison of (SiCAP) with (Infuse) in Posterolateral Instrumented Lumbar Fusion Global Spine J 2015;5:471–478.