Powerbone Flexible Synthetic Bone Graft Matrix

A unique sponge-like resorbable synthetic matrix alternative to autogenous lamella in ridge augmentations.

Powerbone Flexible Graft is a tightly wound resorbable PCA polymer matrix embedded with a highly porous osteostimulatory bone graft which:

• Can be folded and tacked in place in its dry form.

• Can be pre-soaked in bone marrow aspirate or centrifuged blood products.

• Is available in sheets of 2mm, 4mm or 5mm thickness.

UNIQUE FORMULATION

• Unique 3-dimensional PLA lattice creates space, holds the clot, and supports early vascularisation

• Embedded with a highly porous form of Silicate Substituted βeta-Tricalcium Phosphate (β-TCP), peer-reviewed over 12 years.

PREMIUM PERFORMANCE

• Rapid revascularisation and excellent space for new bone across the entire three-dimensional structure.

• Biomechanically, radiographically, and histologically equivalence to autograft (7).

• Induces angiogenesis and fast apatite formation (1,2,5)

FLEXIBLE GRAFT FLEXIBLE OPTIONS

• Can be used alone or mixed with centrifuged blood cells to create an inductive alternative to autogenous bone sheets.

MORE INFO

Powerbone Flexible Graft_Oct20

LINKED PRODUCTS

Inion Resorbable Polymer Tack Kit.  Silicate substitute β-TCPC is also available in Dental Putty and Granule (Crunch) forms.

Powerbone Flexible Graft – CREATED BY EXPERTS FOR EXPERTS

REFERENCES
1.Iimori Y, Kameshima Y, Yasumori A, Okada K. Effect of solid/solution ratio on apatite formation from CaSiO3 ceramics in simulated body fluid. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2004;15:1247–1253.
2.Xu S, Lin K, Wang Z, Chang J, Wang L, Lu J, Ning C. Reconstruction of calvarial defect of rabbits using porous calcium silicate bioactive ceramics. Biomaterials 2008;29:2588–2596.
3.Hing KA, Wilson LF, Buckland T. Comparative performance of three ceramic bone graft substitutes. Spine J. 2007; 7(4):475-490
5.Dashnyam, K.; El-Fiqi, A.; Buitrago, J.O.; Perez, R.A.; Knowles, J.C.; Kim, H.-W. A mini-review focused on the proangiogenic role of silicate ions released from silicon-containing biomaterials. J. Tissue Eng. 2017, 8, 1–13.
6.Test Report Bonegraft Biologic, No: 2018-BME-05-1, 2018-BME-05-2, 2018-BME-05-3 and 2018-BME-05-4. 
7.Licina et al, Comparison of (SiCAP) with (Infuse) in Posterolateral Instrumented Lumbar Fusion Global Spine J 2015;5:471–478.