Powerbone Flexible Synthetic Bone Graft Matrix

A synthetic alternative to autogenous lamella grafts in ridge augmentations.

Powerbone Flexible Graft is a tightly wound resorbable polymer matrix embedded with highly porous osteoinductive bone particles:

• Can be folded and tacked in place in its dry form.

• Can be pre-wetted for increased flexibility.

• Can be pre-soaked in saline, blood, bone marrow aspirate or centrifuged blood products.

• Thickness of 4mm is ideal for ridge augmentation and plating techniques.

UNIQUE FORMULATION

• Densely intertwined lattice of plasma-sprayed PLA + PCL polymer strands creates space, holds the clot, and supports early vascularisation

• Pre-loaded with a highly porous form of resorbable Silicate Substituted βeta-Tricalcium Phosphate – peer-reviewed over 12 years.

FLEXIBLE GRAFT – FLEXIBLE OPTIONS

• Use alone or mix with centrifuged blood cells to create an alternative to autogenous bone sheets without the retrieval trauma.

PREMIUM PERFORMANCE

• Rapid revascularisation and excellent space for new bone across the entire three-dimensional structure.

• Biomechanically, radiographically, and histologically equivalence to autograft (7).

• Induces angiogenesis and fast apatite formation (1,2,5)

MORE INFO

Powerbone Flexible Graft_Oct20

LINKED PRODUCTS

Bionnovation Bone Screw

Inion Resorbable Polymer Tack Kit.  

Powerbone Flexible Graft – CREATED BY EXPERTS FOR EXPERTS

REFERENCES
1.Iimori Y, Kameshima Y, Yasumori A, Okada K. Effect of solid/solution ratio on apatite formation from CaSiO3 ceramics in simulated body fluid. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2004;15:1247–1253.
2.Xu S, Lin K, Wang Z, Chang J, Wang L, Lu J, Ning C. Reconstruction of calvarial defect of rabbits using porous calcium silicate bioactive ceramics. Biomaterials 2008;29:2588–2596.
3.Hing KA, Wilson LF, Buckland T. Comparative performance of three ceramic bone graft substitutes. Spine J. 2007; 7(4):475-490
5.Dashnyam, K.; El-Fiqi, A.; Buitrago, J.O.; Perez, R.A.; Knowles, J.C.; Kim, H.-W. A mini-review focused on the proangiogenic role of silicate ions released from silicon-containing biomaterials. J. Tissue Eng. 2017, 8, 1–13.
6.Test Report Bonegraft Biologic, No: 2018-BME-05-1, 2018-BME-05-2, 2018-BME-05-3 and 2018-BME-05-4. 
7.Licina et al, Comparison of (SiCAP) with (Infuse) in Posterolateral Instrumented Lumbar Fusion Global Spine J 2015;5:471–478.