Search

Powerbone Flexible Graft (Synthetic)

£90.00£125.00

All prices are Excl VAT.

REGEN STORE DISCOUNT - Buy 5 get a 6th Free!

Fully resorbing space creating flexible synthetic graft matrix.

UNIQUE FORMULATION

  • Resorbable polymer lattice embedded 50% with silicate substituted beta-TCP graft granules (0.05-0.1mm)

  • Silicate resorption occurs first inducing angiogenesis and fast apatite formation (1,2,5) in a process biomechanical, radiographically and histologically equivalent to autograft (7) whilst providing an osteoconductive scaffold to support new bone formation.  

  • Compressed non-porous barrier layer.

-4mm thickness – ridge augmentation.

-2mm thickness implant and buccal bone defects.   

FEATURES

  • Osteoinductive.

  • Osteoconductive.

  • Pre-shaped to match socket morphology.

  • Easily trim to fill multi-root or other defects. 

  • Contains no animal or cadaver tissue and is fully resorbable.

FLEXIBLE APPLICATION

  • Wet before application – saline, blood or centrifuged blood products.

  • Can be cut, folded and easily tacked.

RESORPTION

  • Silicate component resorbs first followed by the Beta-TCP.

  • Polymer matrix resorption c6 months. 

MORE INFO

Powerbone Flexible Graft_Oct20

LINKED PRODUCTS

Bionnovation Bone Screw


Powerbone Flexible Graft – CREATED BY EXPERTS FOR EXPERTS


REFERENCES
1.Iimori Y, Kameshima Y, Yasumori A, Okada K. Effect of solid/solution ratio on apatite formation from CaSiO3 ceramics in simulated body fluid. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2004;15:1247–1253.
2.Xu S, Lin K, Wang Z, Chang J, Wang L, Lu J, Ning C. Reconstruction of calvarial defect of rabbits using porous calcium silicate bioactive ceramics. Biomaterials 2008;29:2588–2596.
3.Hing KA, Wilson LF, Buckland T. Comparative performance of three ceramic bone graft substitutes. Spine J. 2007; 7(4):475-490
5.Dashnyam, K.; El-Fiqi, A.; Buitrago, J.O.; Perez, R.A.; Knowles, J.C.; Kim, H.-W. A mini-review focused on the proangiogenic role of silicate ions released from silicon-containing biomaterials. J. Tissue Eng. 2017, 8, 1–13.
6.Test Report Bonegraft Biologic, No: 2018-BME-05-1, 2018-BME-05-2, 2018-BME-05-3 and 2018-BME-05-4. 
7.Licina et al, Comparison of (SiCAP) with (Infuse) in Posterolateral Instrumented Lumbar Fusion Global Spine J 2015;5:471–478.