Upgrade your ethos
Powerbone Dental Putty
- SYNTHETIC BONE GRAFT - GROW STRONGER BONE EASIER -
Membrane Free - No Mixing - Mouldable - Ergonomic syringe - Fully Resorbing - Excellent New Bone
No Mixing
use direct from the syringe
Easier & Quicker
Full patient focus.
no WASH-AWAY
unlike cements
No lost graft
Efficient & Predictable.
FORM STABLE
remove micro movements.
Membrane-Free
Less trauma, quick healing.
PERFORMANCE
significantly enhanced
Compared with
Standard betaTCP (2,3).
Powerbone Dental Putty
True Host Bone Regeneration(1)
Contains Silicate-substituted β-TCP – ahead of standard β-TCP and equivalent to autograft (2,3,4).
Delivers Perfect Handling – no mixing, easily moulded to defect shape with no wash-away.
Requires No Membrane – Viscoelastic holds graft firm and removes micromovement known to slow healing.
Full Resorption: Contains no hydroxyapatite and resorbs fully in a similar time to bone remodelling.
RESULTS FROM HUMAN HISTOLOGY
40-50% new bone* at 12-16 weeks.
More bone than xenograft and allograft, without negative considerations associated with cadaver or animal tissues.
SOCKETS – PERI-IMPLANT DEFECTS – DELAYED GBR – SINUS LIFT
*23% for mineralised allograft, 17% for xenograft. (Imp D 2010;19:330-341, Valentini JOMI, 2018 N/D;33(6):1345-1350).
1. Phrase introduced by Dr Peter Fairbairn to describe Fortoss Vital (Biocomposites, Keele, Staffs – no longer available) and other similar resorbable, synthetic bone graft materials with form-stable properties.
2. Hing KA, Wilson LF, Buckland T. Comparative performance of three ceramic bone graft substitutes. Spine J. 2007; 7(4):475-490.
3. Nagineni, Vamsi V., et al. “Silicate-substituted calcium phosphate ceramic bone graft replacement for spinal fusion procedures.” Spine 37.20 (2012): E1264-E1272
4. Licina et al, Comparison of (SiCAP) with (Infuse) in Posterolateral Instrumented Lumbar Fusion Global Spine J 2015;5:471–478.
Clinical images courtesy of Dr Minas Leventis. https://dentalexelixis.co.uk/