Regen Store
Search

Powerbone Granules – autogenous substitute graft (synthetic)

£59.00£278.00

All prices are Excl VAT.

REGEN STORE DISCOUNT - Buy 5 get a 6th Free!

SKU: powerbone-crunch Categories: , , ,

Biomechanically, radiographically, and histologically equivalent to autograft* with significantly enhanced regeneration compared to standard β-TCP*

A porous bone with inductive and conductive properties that resorbs fully in line with bone healing whilst containing no animal or human tissue.

PREMIUM PERFORMANCE

  • Highly porous (c70%) enabling rapid revascularisation and excellent space for new bone across the entire structure.

  • Attracts cells, induces angiogenesis and apatite formation (1,2,5).

  • Greater bone fusion and significantly enhanced bone regeneration compared to pure β-TCP. (3,4)

  • Biomechanically, radiographically, and histologically equivalent to autograft (7)


UNIQUE FORMULATION

  • Contains a highly porous form of silicate-substituted βeta-Tricalcium Phosphate (β-TCP).

  • Peer-reviewed over 12 years.

FLEXIBILITY

  • Use alone or to bulk out autogenous bone particles.

  • Infill with space-creating devices such as Titanium Mesh, Cortical Plate or Powerbone Adsorbing Synthetic Barrier.

  • Ideal carrier for antibiotics or as a basis for sticky bone when mixed with centrifuged blood products.


EASY FOLLOW-UP

Resorption of Powerbone grafts can be followed on x-ray – an important feature compared to standard β-TCP.

DOWNLOADS

Powerbone Crunch Graft_Oct20

Sticky Bone Protocol_Powerbone at Regen Store_Sept20


COMPANION PRODUCTS

Powerbone Resorbable Synthetic Membrane.

*REFERENCES
1.Iimori Y, Kameshima Y, Yasumori A, Okada K. Effect of solid/solution ratio on apatite formation from CaSiO3 ceramics in simulated body fluid. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2004;15:1247–1253. 
2.Xu S, Lin K, Wang Z, Chang J, Wang L, Lu J, Ning C. Reconstruction of calvarial defect of rabbits using porous calcium silicate bioactive ceramics. Biomaterials 2008;29:2588–2596. 
3.Hing KA, Wilson LF, Buckland T. Comparative performance of three ceramic bone graft substitutes. Spine J. 2007; 7(4):475-490. 
4.Nagineni, Vamsi V., et al. "Silicate-substituted calcium phosphate ceramic bone graft replacement for spinal fusion procedures." Spine 37.20 (2012): E1264-E1272. 
5.Dashnyam, K.; El-Fiqi, A.; Buitrago, J.O.; Perez, R.A.; Knowles, J.C.; Kim, H.-W. A mini-review focused on the proangiogenic role of silicate ions released from silicon-containing biomaterials. J. Tissue Eng. 2017, 8, 1–13. 
6.Test Report Bonegraft Biologic, No: 2018-BME-05-1, 2018-BME-05-2, 2018-BME-05-3 and 2018-BME-05-4. 
7.Licina et al, Comparison of (SiCAP) with (Infuse) in Posterolateral Instrumented Lumbar Fusion Global Spine J 2015;5:471–478. 
Related Products