Powerbone Dental Putty is a fully resorbing, mouldable, self-hardening, synthetic bone graft which delivers up to 50% new bone in 12 to 16 weeks.

Powerbone Dental Putty is a trusted material with an innovative combination of Silicate Substituted β-tricalcium phosphate in a high-viscosity cellulose viscoelastic.  This innovative combination is key to its success.

Buy 5, get 1 free. 

Why choose Powerbone Dental Putty? 

EASE OF USE

• Pre-mixed syringe saves time (0.3cc, 0.5cc, and 1.0cc) -unlike ethoss, 3d Bond/Bond Apatite, which need mixing.

• No fixed working time – unlike ethoss, 3d Bond/Bond Apatite, which have restricted working times.

• Resilience to wash away – even in a wet field – unlike ethoss, 3d Bond/Bond Apatite cements.  

• Ergonomically curved syringe with finger grips  – Unlike ethoss, 3d Bond/Bond Apatite, which use cheap diabetic syringes.

NO MEMBRANE 

• The built-in cellulose viscoelastic binder stabilises the graft without needing an additional collagen membrane. The high viscosity formulation delivers stability, self-containment and resilience to micromovement – ideal for minimal access approaches with site-specific flaps.

PREMIUM PERFORMANCE

• Up to 50% new bone in 12 to 16 weeks, proven by human histology. 

• Significantly enhanced bone regeneration compared to β-tricalcium phosphate. (3,4)

• Regenerates bone radiographically and histologically equivalent to autogenous bone. (7)

ENHANCED SAFETY

• As a 100% synthetic product, it eliminates the risk of cross-contamination.

COMPLETE RESORPTION 

In line with bone healing and remodelling, making Powerbone Dental Putty ideal for:

• Socket grafting.

  • Perfect socket fill.

  • Seal with a cross suture over Ora-Aid self-adhering wound barrier or PeriAcryl Oral Adhesive. 

  • Protocol video at https://youtu.be/4iMnZ-KgKN0

• 3-walled GBR defects.

  • One-stage simultaneous graft and implant placement.

  • Two-stage- traditional GBR. 

• Sinus Lift.

• Bony Cysts.

  • Alone or as retention of Powerbone, fully synthetic bone graft granules

UNIQUE FORMULATION 

• Contains a highly porous form of Silicate Substituted βeta-Tricalcium Phosphate (Peer-reviewed over 12 years) developed by St Mary’s University, London.

• High-viscosity cellulose viscoelastic carrier supplemented with trace ZrO2 (0.1%) for antibacterial efficacy and radiopacity.

RADIOPAQUE FOR CLEAR FOLLOW-UP

Resorption of all Powerbone grafts can be followed easily on x-ray – an important feature compared to standard β-TCP, which can be difficult to detect at review.

EVIDENCE BASE

• Highly porous matrix (c70%) enabling rapid revascularisation and excellent space for new bone across the entire three-dimensional structure.

• Induces angiogenesis and fast apatite formation (1,2,5).

• Greater bone fusion and significantly enhanced bone regeneration compared to pure β-TCP. (3,4)

• Comparisons to rhBMP-2 in terms of bone growth and fusion (7)

• Biomechanically, radiographically, and histologically equivalent to autograft (7)

MEMBRANE-FREE PROTOCOL

Membrane Free Protocol_Powerbone Dental Putty

SPEC SHEET

Powerbone Dental Putty_Regen Store

FEATURED CASE

Implant and Grafting Nasopalatine duct_Dr M Leventis_Low Res

CREATED BY EXPERTS FOR EXPERTS

REFERENCES
1.Iimori Y, Kameshima Y, Yasumori A, Okada K. Effect of solid/solution ratio on apatite formation from CaSiO3 ceramics in simulated body fluid. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2004;15:1247–1253.
2.Xu S, Lin K, Wang Z, Chang J, Wang L, Lu J, Ning C. Reconstruction of calvarial defect of rabbits using porous calcium silicate bioactive ceramics. Biomaterials 2008;29:2588–2596.
3.Hing KA, Wilson LF, Buckland T. Comparative performance of three ceramic bone graft substitutes. Spine J. 2007; 7(4):475-490.
4.Nagineni, Vamsi V., et al. "Silicate-substituted calcium phosphate ceramic bone graft replacement for spinal fusion procedures." Spine 37.20 (2012): E1264-E1272.
5.Dashnyam, K.; El-Fiqi, A.; Buitrago, J.O.; Perez, R.A.; Knowles, J.C.; Kim, H.-W. A mini-review focused on the proangiogenic role of silicate ions released from silicon-containing biomaterials. J. Tissue Eng. 2017, 8, 1–13. 
6.Test Report Bonegraft Biologic, No: 2018-BME-05-1, 2018-BME-05-2, 2018-BME-05-3 and 2018-BME-05-4.
7.Licina et al, Comparison of (SiCAP) with (Infuse) in Posterolateral Instrumented Lumbar Fusion Global Spine J 2015;5:471–478.
9.Wheeler, et al. Efficacy of silicated calcium phosphate graft in posterolateral lumbar fusion in sheep. The Spine Journal 7 (2007) 308–317

Clinical Images: Dr Minas Leventis.